v. Hicks, --- U.S. ----, ----, 113 S.Ct. Defendant had been present when his companion (co-defendant) shot and killed a man at the conclusion of a discussion. at 234. 20020486-CA APPELLANT'S BRIEF Appeal from the Third District Court, Summit County, Judge Hilder Hicks v. Mid-Kansas Oil & No. V.M. Hicks told Shane that if he did not emerge from Koontz's house after a brief period, Shane should go home. Decided: 02/20/1996. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Argued March 21, 200l-Decided June 25, 2001. In about 2001, he was picked up in Afghanistan by the US, and eventually transported to Guantanamo Bay. Opinion for Casa Marie, Inc. v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico for the District of Arecibo, Casa Marie, Inc., 988 F.2d 252 Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Petitioner filed a motion to remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Get Hicks v. Hicks, 733 So. 3:21-cr-00281-VC - USA v. Sparks CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING TRIAL TO START 9/9/2022, AND SETTING A STATUS CONFERENCE FOR 6/1/2022, TO SET A FULL CASE SCHEDULE, as to Kenneth Orlando Sparks. He was held there, without charge, for 5 years. Case Number: 82203. . 99-1994. They contend that the Superior Court erred : 78-6885. 1249 (D United States v. Sparks,2 F.3d. See Apex Oil Co. v. Sparks (In re Apex Oil Co.), 406 F.3d 538, 542 (8th Cir. 67 OBJ 698. The Association encourages legislative proposals. United States was an appeal on behalf of former Guantnamo detainee David Hicks asking the U.S. Court of Military Commission Review to overturn his conviction for providing material support for terrorism, a charge that was invalidated in 2012 when the D.C. Circuit ruled in Hamdan v. Sometimes courts make simple mistakes. V) does not authorize a convicted state defendant to assert a claim for damages against a police officer for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal trial. Document Cited authorities 20 Cited in 8 Precedent Map Related. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. 2005), United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. 574(5th Cir. Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. at 165-66; Love-Lane v. Martin, 355 F.3d 766, 783 (4th Cir. PETITIONER:St. Marys Honor Center et al. A bullet fired through the floor of respondent's apartment injured a man on the floor below. Hicks presented a claim on April 2011, regarding her issues to Progressive Northern Insurance Co, (Sparks liability carrier) and spoke with Sharon OConnell who was handling the claim. Malibu Inv. Each of these official-capacity claims within a single Cause of Action represents one claim against the City. See United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 103, and nn. Audio Transcription for Oral Argument October 21, 1965 in Hicks v. District of Columbia Earl Warren: J. Hicks, Petitioner versus District of Columbia. 2. CH 14 p422 - Galloway v. Iowa The delay in executing a search warrant for cell phones was not unreasonable, and exclusion would not be the proper remedy if it was. The RRHA gave respondent, Hicks, a nonresident, written notice barring him from Whitcomb Court. . Get Hicks v. United States, 150 U.S. 442 (1893), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Right to reimbursement for attorneys fees under rule 15 (d). Appeal from the District Court of Tulsa County. 46 No. Explore Resources For Cases & Codes Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 327, 107 S.Ct. 1993) 90. See also United States v. Smith, 103 F.3d 600, 603 (7th Cir.1996). Subsequently, he trespassed there and was arrested and convicted. Furthermore, each document may not meet the requirements of the local rules in your district. Parol evidence is STEPHEN C. HICKS Professor of Law, Suffolk University Law School, Boston, MA in practically all cases supply the accustomed variants for that speaker's usage if the elements presented in the key are substituted in accordance with the sample indica tions. DOCKET NO. Hicks v Cutrer (Bogalusa) (ED La, #66,225) Aug 23, 1966: Pl brought class suit for city Negroes to declare unconstitutional a city ordinance regulating marches and parades and to enjoin its enforcement. April 17, 2017 by: Content Team. Defendant waived application for probation and did not request referral to the Youth Authority. : : : : : : : : : : C.A. Written and curated by real attorneys at Submitted November 16, 1893. Supreme Court of United States. OPINION. 8, 9 (1976) (citing cases). DECIDED BY: Rehnquist Court (1991-1993) LOWER COURT: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. See Causes of Action 7, 13-16. CH 13 p405 - Stephen A. Vol. Hicks rear ended by Sparks, Hicks settled and Sparks insurance paid final release. 1334(b), holding that a state court could rule on dischargeability issues, and noting that Congress granted state courts concurrent Plaintiff, administrator of Carol Greitens estate, sued the United States Government under the Federal Torts Claims Act (Act) for a naval doctors alleged medical malpractice, arguing that the doctor negligently failed to diagnose Greitens ailment, causing her death. The Department passed a resolution to drop the case against the National Organization on the management of Pershing hall. 6:10cv00047 MEMORANDUM OPINION JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON This matter is before the Court on 86-1027. Furthermore, ALJs have a duty to analyze all of the relevant evidence and to provide a sufficient explanation for their rationale in crediting certain evidence. Bill Branch Coal Corp. v. Sparks, 213 F.3d 186, 190 (4th Cir. JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443 (1971), we said that, in certain circumstances, a warrantless seizure by police of an item that comes within plain view during their lawful search of a private area may be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Decided March 7, 1983. Get Hicks v. State, 554 P.2d 1153 (1975), Supreme Court of New Mexico, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Research the case of Samuel Jones v. Town of Spring Lake, NC, from the Fourth Circuit, 05-10-2022. By the Court, BATJER, J.: Appellant was charged with the murder of Glenn E. Christiernsson. 805 So.2d 1141, 1149-50 (La. People v. Hicks, No. Dr. John Griffith purchased life insurance, didn't make a payment Had 90 day grace period extension to pay Hicks v. Sparks. The Court held that in order for the plain view doctrine to apply, police must establish probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of allegedly stolen equipment. Arizona v. Hicks Case Brief The defendant shot a gun through the floor of his apartment which injured the man living under him. LEXIS 48891 (D.D.C. Argued December 8, 1986. Ker Fast Facts: Arizona v. Mainly, this case as I mention on the brief Rogers case and the Davenport case and both cases of the Act withstood assaults against it on constitutional grounds. Sparks. 1988). And simple mistakes call for simple fixes. AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research service that gives you unlimited access to massive amounts of valuable legal data. Aplt.App. Police learned of the conditions at defendant's residence from defendant's prior employees, who gave accounts of floors covered in layers of Com., Ky., 335 S.W.2d 556 (1960), are not applicable. Nov.8, 1996). The cases span over half the states and are being litigated in both federal and state courts. lower courts decison. No. her injuries are materially different from those contemplated in the release-mistake of fact that she did not assume the risk -rescission of release. In the wake of the federal jury's guilt/innocence verdict in the case of United States v.Terry Nichols, a looming question is whether the principles of collateral estoppel first established in Ashe v.. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 445, 90 S.Ct. James V. Sparks FR01, 1932-1933: Walter E. Lindquist FR01, 1966-1969: Kenneth Harvey HICKS, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, Nevada, Respondent. This case, LBI, Inc. v. Sparks, et al., KNL-cv12-6018984-S, is a classic example of the blatant theft of an employers confidential and proprietary information that [99] *fn1 The Court has held that the prosecutor's knowing use of perjured testimony violates due process, but has not held that the false testimony of a police officer in itself violates constitutional rights. : 92-602. 460 U.S. 325. Brief Fact Summary. Pp. Saint Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 113 S. Ct. 2742 (1993) 104. Ashcroft, 355 F.3d 1222, 1235-36 (10th Cir. Thompson brief and argue [the defendants] case against the Commonwealths interlocutory appeal with Mr. Sparks knowledge and authorization." brief campos emely campos professor samuels blaw 280 brief: coma corporation kansas department of labor facts: cesar martinez corral worked at coma corporation Issue Preclusion, Collateral Estoppel, Dual Sovereignty and. St. Mary's Honor Ctr. Case opinion for MO Court of Appeals SPARKS v. SPARKS. HICKS v. SHERIFF. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. ORDER On this 25th day of March 2014, it appears to the Court that: (1) Plaintiffs-Below/Appellants Patricia J. Hicks and her husband, Frank L. Hicks, appeal from a Superior Court s grant of a Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of Defendant-Below/Appellee Debra Sparks. Also, this collection contains briefs from a variety of jurisdictions; hence, many documents may contain case law not applicable to your circuit. of Dallas, 251 S.W.3d 165, 174 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2013, no pet.) In this case, however, the court did not follow the mandatory language of I. C. 19-2513, but instead imposed a term of 22 years fixed, more than double the 2742, 2752, 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993). 2007. LOCATION:City Council of Hialeah. Citation10 N.Y.2d 488, 225 N.Y.S.2d 34, 180 N.E.2d 425 (N.Y. 1962) Brief Fact Summary. Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d. of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 2002); Commonwealth v. Sparks, 746 N.E.2d 133, 136 (Mass. Held: Title 42 U.S.C. OCTOBER TERM, 2000. This affidavit accompanied a motion for reconsideration, which was denied. See Shaw v. Cnty. This preview shows page 78 - 81 out of 92 pages. William Earle White (J. H. Barney; White, Hamilton, Wyche & Shell, on brief), for the appellees. Ct. 1971) 37 As is set forth in the Statement of the Case section of this brief above, the alleged breaches of Sections 6.E., 6.F., 6.G., 6. HICKS v. UNITED STATES. Syllabus. Utah Court of Appeals Briefs 2002 George Weinstein v. Ronald Popiel and Jamie Popiel : Brief of Appellant Case No. 971. Defendant Hicks was jointly indicted with Stan Rowe for murder. In the present case, Dr. Lenkeys opinion on the role pneumoconiosis played in Mr. Bureks BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth v. Hicks, 156 A.3d 1114 (Pa. 2017) .. 15, 19 Commonwealth v. Hughes, 555 A Commonwealth v. Sparks, 492 A.2d 720 (Pa. Super. E.A. David M. Ebel, by appointment of the Court, 444 U.S. 988 , argued the cause for petitioner. Hicks. For more information or to submit proposals, contact the Arkansas Bar Association office at (501) 375-4606 or (800) 609-5668. Find out more about this topic, read articles and blogs or research legal issues, cases, and codes on FindLaw.com. Texas 5th Court of Appeals Case Files: An Inventory of 5th Court of Appeals Case Files at the Texas State Archives, and which likely include briefs and arguments, statements of fact, transcripts of proceedings from lower courts, motions, subpoenas, opinions, judgments, exhibits, and bills of cost, 1892-1902. No. The officers noticed expensive equipment, which they Colorado, for Amicus Curiae Colorado Manufactured Housing Association (On the Brief). Fourth Circuit, within whose jurisdiction this case arises, has held that pneumoconiosis is a substantially contributing cause of death if it hastens the miners death in any way. 1149, 94 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987). The parties entered into a written agreement containing one condition. With her on the brief was Jan Eric Cartwright, Attorney General. Vincent. -Hicks filed suit against sparks for negligence. Hicks, who was seventy-two years old at the time of the accident, went to the Emergency Room and followed up with her family physician a few days later with complaints of neck pain and headaches. Rule 15 provides for interlocutory Certain parties alleged that a second oral condition was also present. Such is not the case in Hicks' situation. that was rear-ended by Sparks. Various corporate interests were to be merged into a single holding company. Respondent Hicks is a member of the Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribes of western Nevada and lives on the Tribes' reservation. David Hicks was an Australian citizen by birth who travelled overseas to assist, in some capacity, with groups associated with the Taliban, sometime around 1999. [912 P.2d 331] Certiorari to the Court of Appeals, Division I Appeal From the District Court of Tulsa County; On this matter the record is silent. Arch Ins. (to preserve complaint for appellate review, party must generally present the complaint to the trial court by timely request, motion, or objection, stating She received medical treatment and physical therapy for headaches and neck pain for approximately fifteen visits. We hope this article serves as a useful reference and guide to any questions you may have about the legal landscape of same-sex marriage. Facts. 1423, 1429, 99 L.Ed.2d 721 (1988) ("[T]he labels affixed either to the proceeding or to the relief imposed . Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. Arizona v. Hicks. 19, 2022). Syllabus. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. Syllabus. 08-0593 BLA file a response brief.4 The Boards scope of review is defined by statute. Supreme Court of Nevada. Oklahoma - Case Briefs - 1979. Just so here. RESPONDENT:Oklahoma. 662 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir. United States v. Irwin Halper Hicks v. Feiock, 485 U.S. 624, 631, 108 S.Ct. Sept 15: Trial; decision pending. 2000) (holding that an expert opinion that fails to offer some reasoning to support the conclusion that pneumoconiosis hastened death is insuffi-cient to support an award of benefits). Bill Branch Coal Corp. v. Sparks, 213 F.3d 186, 192 (4th Cir. United States v. Irwin Halper, Court Case No. After the collision, Hicks went to the emergency room and followed up with her physician concerning her neck pains and headaches, and was given medical Explore Resources For Cases & Codes [Butler v. Hicks, 229 Ga. 72, 74, 189 S 283 S.E.2d 454 (1981); Sparks v. Sparks, 256 Ga. 788, 353 S.E.2d 508 (1987).] The United States Supreme Court found that officers must reasonably suspect criminal activity in order for them to lawfully seize items in plain view without a search warrant. Unit A Dec.1981). Get Hicks v. United States, 368 F.2d 626 (4th Cir. At trial, he claimed among other things that the RRHAs policy was unconstitutionally overbroad. Synopsis of Rule of Law. 2002); State v. Higgins, 796 A.2d 50, 54 (Me. 909].) 171833, 1996 WL 33348772 (Mich.Ct.App. At trial, the Governments evidence demonstrated that although Defendant did not actually fire the shot that killed Rowe, he participated with Rowe in inducing the victim into the street where he was killed. and it is within this court's discretion whether to apply the rule in a given case. FACTS: Jonathan Adams was 9 years old when his grandfather died. DOCKET NO. In such cases, however, a trial court must on its own motion consider the referral of eligible defendants. There the record or testimony other than that of a juror revealed such bias as would justify challenge for cause. The district court concluded the bags did not lawfully come within Owens' plain view because Sparks "was arrested at the rear end of the truck" and Owens did not observe the bags until after Sparks' arrest. Case opinion for IN Supreme Court HICKS v. STATE. Now this Court has no obligation to rove about looking for errors to correct in every case in this large country, and I agree with much in Justice Scalias dissent in Nunez v. United States, 554 U. S. 911, 911913 (2008), suggesting caution. The authorities relied upon by Hicks, Pennington v. Janet L. Cox, Assistant Attorney General of Oklahoma, [447 U.S. 343, 344] argued the cause pro hac vice for respondent. No. Please writing several sentence to summary each case that I list blow, Brief the cases beginning on page 1. Hicks v. United States was an appeal on behalf of former Guantnamo detainee David Hicks asking the U.S. Court of Military Commission Review to overturn his conviction for providing material support for terrorism, a charge that was invalidated in 2012 when the D.C. defendants contentions. Arizona v. Hicks (1987) clarified the need for probable cause when seizing evidence in plain view. Bozeman v. Orum, 422 F3d 1265, 1271 (11th Cir. 1985) (abrogated on other grounds by Lively v. Bowen, 858 F.2d 177, 180 (4th Cir. 2d 347 (1987). US Life Insurance v. Wilson case. CH 13 p411 - Hicks v. Sparks. Mr. Speiser. An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. No. 1983 (1976 ed., Supp. 4. Research the case of State v. Rucker, from the Court of Appeals of Maryland, 04-14-2003. Plaintiff, administrator of Carol Greitens estate, sued the United States Government under the Federal Torts Claims Act (Act) for a naval doctors alleged medical malpractice, arguing that the doctor negligently failed to diagnose Greitens ailment, causing her death. N13C-02-131 CEB Date Submitted: July 9, 2013 Date Decided: September 25, 2013 MEMORANDUM OPINION. RESPONDENT:Hicks. The duplicative claims (within Causes of Action 5, 7, 8-11, 13-19) should be dismissed. Co. v. Sparks, 996 P.2d 1043 (Utah 2000) 38. The court in Hicks v. Quaker Oats Co. faced a somewhat analogous situation and made a similar ruling. Decided March 3, 1987. United States v. Sparks, 2022 U.S. Dist. plaintiffs contentions. Also, defendant was in custody in the meantime, and he had no possessory interest in the phones while in jail. 2000); Shuff v. Cedar Coal Co., 967 F.2d Case Law; Colorado; Boulder Meadows v. Saville, No. DECIDED BY: Burger Court (1975-1981) LOWER COURT: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals. Marine Park Assocs. Note from the Editor: The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive national survey of recent cases regarding same-sex marriage laws. 87-1383 in the Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. What ANALYSIS or legal reasoning did the court use in the Hicks v Sparks case?Hicks contends that surgery for a herniated disc is materially different from the minor head and neck injuries contemplated at the time of release. The Defendant, Hicks (Defendant), was jointly indicted with another man on one count of murder. Ohio, 360 U. S. 423, 360 U. S. 436 (1959), there is no indication in the court's opinion that it passed on the issue of the search of the automobile, nor is there any indication in the petitioners' briefs in that court that the issue was presented. Hicks is rear ended by sparks Hicks settled becausee she thought she was done with the injuries then found that their arm was still hurt so tried to get more money from sparks Hicks consulted with attorneys and signed a release after she thought her injuries were done so now she cant sue more after payout since case has settled. Camille Ching BUS LAW (T/TH) 9 November 2017 Chapter 13 case summary: Hicks v. Sparks Facts: In March of 2011 72-year-old Patricia Hicks was the passenger in a car when they were rear ended by Debra Sparks. 2d 1139 (2010) [2010 BL 188636] Brief Fact Summary. United States v. Sabillon-Umana, 772 F. 3d 1328, 1333 (CA10 2014). BLW 201 Brief Cases (6) Chapter 4 - Tarkowski ; Preview text. We agree with the district court that Theard offered no direct evidence that Glaxo's articulated reason for not promoting her was a pretext for discrimination, and the circumstantial evidence she proffered was not adequate to create a triable issue. As they were escaping after the murder, Rowe was killed and Defendant was captured. I., 6. Patricia Hicks in car accident, rear ended by Sparks Accepted settlement, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY PATRICIA J. HICKS, and her husband, FRANK L. HICKS, Plaintiffs, v. DEBRA SPARKS, Defendant. move to summary judgement. 1966), United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Fraud requires proof of five elements: (i) false representation made by the defendant, (ii) knowledge by the defendant that the representation was false when made, (iii) intent to induce the plaintiff to act or refrain from acting, (iv) justifiable reliance by the plaintiff, and (v) damage to the plaintiff. 2004); Hicks v. The Hicks raise one claim on appeal. 480 U.S. 321. Summary: In this New Hampshire case, Christina Fay appeals her convictions on seventeen counts of cruelty to animals. CIVIL NO. The Defendant, Hicks (Defendant), was jointly indicted with another man on one count of murder. Defendant had been present when his companion (co-defendant) shot and killed a man at the conclusion of a discussion. Defendant then rode off on horseback with co-defendant after the shooting. Get Hicks v. Charles Pfizer & Co., 466 F.Supp.2d 799 (E.D. Present, Eggleston, C.J., and Buchanan, Whittle, Snead, I'Anson and Carrico, 1. LOCATION:United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [Meade] v. Oliver Coal Co., BRB No. 2 Hicks v. Hicks, 859 S.W.2d 842, 845 (Mo.App.W.D.1993). The Virginia Court of Appeals vacated his conviction. Bozeman v. Orum, 422 F3d 1265, 1271 11th Cir. In any case, the dissenting judge concluded, the case should not have been decided on summary judgment as a reasonable jury could have concluded the guards actions were malicious. 3:19-mj-71451-MAG - USA v. Hicks CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING HEARING as to Kimberly Hicks. Case opinion for US 10th Circuit UNITED STATES v. SPARKS. Com., Ky., 316 S.W.2d 221 (1958), and Tayloe v. He asked her if they would find any firearms or contraband in the house. The lower court found the evidence insufficient to establish negligence on the part of the Lawaspect.com. Hicks v. J.H. 1189, 1195, 25 L.Ed.2d 469 1 The Board set forth the complete procedural history of this case in its prior decision. Case. With him on the briefs was Richard A. Sonntag. Wheat Trust v. Sparks . (People v. Sparks (1968) 262 Cal.App.2d 597, 600 [68 Cal. Hicks v. Oklahoma. Full text of "Reports of cases adjudged and determined in the Supreme court of judicature and Court for the trial of impeachments and correction of Following is the case brief for Arizona v. Hicks, United States Supreme Court, (1987) Case summary for Arizona v. Hicks: Hicks shot a gun through the floor of his apartment and responding officers searched the apartment for the victim, the shooter and weapons. Betty J. SPARKS, Appellant, v. David HICKS, M.D., and Orthopedic Specialists of Tulsa, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, Appellees. I.N.S., 259 F.3d 482, 487 (6th Cir. Hire Writer ; Plagiarism Cheker ; Free Resources Citation22 Ill.131 S. Ct. 51, 177 L. Ed. Hicks v. Sparks Facts:Patricia Hicks (plaintiff) was rear-ended by Debra Sparks (Defendant), as a result Hicks received medical treatment and physical therapy for neck pain and headaches. The lower court found the evidence insufficient to establish negligence on the part of the 2d 1261 (1999), Court of Appeals of Louisiana, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. 3. In January of 1955 Charlie R. Sparks and wife and C. O. Sparks signed a contract to convey a tract of land to Hawks, who was to prepare the deed. 2005; Cockrell v. Sparks, 510 F3d 1307, 1311 11th Cir. Full text of "The law in civil actions and proceedings in the various courts of the state of New York : including the principles of law relating to actions or defenses, and the rules of evidence, together with citation of authorities ..See other formats PETITIONER:Hicks. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. The administrative law judges Bill Branch Coal Corp. v. Sparks, 213 F.3d 186, 190, 22 BLR 2-251, 2- Written and curated by real attorneys at Kolodziej did the route and demanded the money and sued. Bill Branch Coal Corp. v. Sparks, 213 F.3d 186, 190, BLR (4th Cir. CH 13 p413 - Sumerel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company . NEVADA ET AL. 2005) (discussing 28 U.S.C. 460 U. S. 329 -346. Mar. 2. At the request of the parties, the Utah Supreme Court Briefs 2001 Richard W. Miller v. Sheryl Rae (Miller) Marticorena and Sergio A. Marticorena : Petition for Rehearing Barry v. Sparks, 306 Mass 80, 27NE2d, 728, 128 ALR 983 (1940) 5 Wright v. Hicks, 12 Ga. 1551, 56 Am Dec. 451 12 iii v. Johnson, 274 N.E.2d 645 (Ill. App. By: James M. Murphy, Esq. v. HICKS ET AL. 5986. Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 327, 107 S. Ct. 1149, 94 L. Ed. 2004) (citing cases and noting that Department of State reports are probative evidence concerning country conditions); Koliada v. Hicks. 99CA0687. CITATION: 509 US 502 (1993) ARGUED: Apr 20, 1993. CASE # Eddie Toma Professor Staruck Business Law 201 9 February 2016 Case 14-ZELNICK vs ADAMS Supreme Court of Virginia, 2002 263 Va 601, 561 S.E 711. The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed petitioner's conviction and sentence. Rptr. in this regard, and no party in the present case actually challenges this ruling. United States v. Tex. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. In 2017, a search warrant executed at her residence resulted in the seizure of over 70 Great Danes. Brief Fact Summary. United States v. Terry Nichols. Mason was an attorney for a murder case who jokingly offered an interviewer $1 million if anyone could travel in a specified route in under a said amount of time. We will not address issues raised for the first time in a reply brief. - 1 - IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG DIVISION PATRICIA S. EWALD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J.ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Rodrick Jackson sued the City of Hearne, several of its officials and officers, and private citizens under 42 U.S.C.